While “Frost at Midnight” finds Coleridge engaging in a
remarkable degree of imagery, I found myself most drawn to its sound and meter
that is both directly discussed by the speaker and bolstered by the play of
lines.
After our introduction to the “secret ministry” of frost, we
arrive at “the owlet’s cry” which “Came loud – and hark, again! loud as before”
(2-3). Coleridge, in the first three lines of his poem, sets up a dichotomy
that concerns his speaker throughout the poem: the absence of sound and sound
itself. The two often become entangled throughout later lines – it is unclear when silence is “strange” or disturbing and when it is reassuring, an utterance
of God. It seems as though the poem also scans the stressed syllables in
spondees clustering around the “loud” sections – the owl’s hoot “came loud” and
is followed by a “hark again,” versus a gentler iambic pentameter matching the
quiet moments.
I am unsure when the speaker mentions a calmness that
“disturbs / And vexes meditation with its strange / And extreme silentness”
(8-10) if he means the peaceful slumbering of the infant. I’m tempted to say
that this strange, extreme silentness is the general solitude of the speaker
alone in the cottage where all else are at rest. Following on the lines of
iambs vs. spondees, these lines seem to scan more along the lines of the
“secret ministry” of frost. This leads into the “populous village,” where the
“numberless goings on of life,” are as “Inaudible as dreams!” The speaker finds
himself, in silent solitude before the frost’s performance, separated from the
sea, hill, and wood – and yet, there’s an inaudibility, or absence of sound,
there in the village too. Maybe this means that the speaker’s solitude prevents
him from engaging in the village’s audibility – he is not part of the “goings
on” there. Perhaps it means, instead, that his solitude is just as empty as
those daily events, which are inaudible like dreams. However, considering the
positive attributes given to dreams later in the poem, it seems like the
silence in terms of the “sea, hill and wood,” is not disturbing and does not “vex
meditation” (10-14).
The film among former flame, the “sole unquiet thing,”
provides the speaker with “dim sympathies” (16 and 18). It provides a peak into
the “hush of nature.” The “unquiet thing” reminds the speaker of “the poor
man’s only music” – church bells from his childhood. Again, “old church-town”
and “poor man’s only music” features a spondaic meter that contrasts with the
“sole unquiet thing” of the film “which fluttered on the grate.” This metrical
difference seems to contrast the two images that are, for the speaker,
metonymically linked. The meter allows us to hold these two images separate
from one another while they speak across the lines to each other.
Ultimately it is what is heard
that the poem is concerned with, even if the thing that makes noise does so
quietly. The “gentle breathings” of the child are “heard in this deep calm”
(45). The child’s sleep becomes like the church bells with its “articulate
sounds of things to come” (33). The speaker still emphasizes the visual – it is
what the babe shall “see and hear / The lovely shapes and sound intelligible”
that matter, but it is not seen in God, but is instead God who “utters” and
thus “mould[s] / Thy spirit.”
Lovely reading, John. Whatever you think of the ideas or artifice of Coleridge's lyrics, he is really great at producing beautiful lines, anticipating and helping Keats's notion of a muscular tongue. And we see here too a very active imagination, working in and with nothing, as it were. The key images of the poem--the "stranger" of soot in the grate, and the icicles and moon and frost, are all literally lifeless, and yet produce something beautiful. Just as in "Lime-Tree" the poet turns absence and loss into writing, here he turns silence into a kind of music.
ReplyDelete