While there are clear stylistic similarities between
“Anecdote For Fathers” and “Tintern Abbey,” Wordsworth’s depiction of the
attitude toward a childhood bond with nature is far more hostile in the former
than in the latter.
In both
poems, Wordsworth uses almost prose-like verse to tell a story and emphasizes
both age and nature throughout. He is staying true to his doctrine: he uses the
language of common people—mostly avoiding
hifalutin poetic devices—and he writes with a clear purpose. In “Anecdote For
Fathers,” he means to share a moment between a father and son as they go on a
walk at the most foundational level. In “Tintern Abbey,” he means to share how
his trip with his sister back to the banks of the Wye river prompted him to
muse on the nature of time, perspective, interconnectedness, and nature itself.
When I read
“Tintern Abbey,” I couldn’t help but think about how much more peaceful this
speaker’s poetic voice (Wordsworth’s voice) is than that of the father in
“Anecdote For Fathers.” In Wordsworth’s autobiographical poem, he looks back on
his interactions with the natural world as an adolescent, describing them as
full of “animal movements” (74), “aching joys” (84), and “dizzy raptures” (85).
He then goes on to assert that he feels a deeper appreciation with nature as an
adult than he did “in the hour of thoughtless youth” (89). He now looks on
nature with “elevated thoughts” and a “sense sublime” (95). In seeing the
interconnectedness of the world around him, the speaker is better able to make
a true connection to nature.
In
contrast, the speaker in “Anecdote For Fathers” seems to crave his old boyish connection
with nature. He exhibits this to the point of almost animalistic craving. For
example, he describes his son as though the son were a possession and he
describes his insistence and intensity when he asks his son whether he prefers
Kilve’s beach or Liswyn Farm. The father’s aching envy is clear when at the end
of the poem he asks to know just a fraction of the son’s whimsical existence.
I find it
impressive that Wordsworth was either able to construct a false reality about
his own worldview (in “Tintern Abbey”) or to construct such a believable
speaker in “Anecdote For Fathers,” who so desperately wants to reconnect with
his long-gone boyish relationship to nature but cannot.

I like the comparisons you make here, and especially the idea that Wordsworth as poet is constructing different persona in each poem. I think this is an important thing to notice--the speakers perhaps often seem "auto-biographical," but sometimes they are explicitly not that, or attempt explicitly to be that (as with "Tintern Abbey"). Even so, in both cases, the speakers are still in some sense constructed by the poem.
ReplyDelete