In a “Preface to
Lyrical Ballads” Wordsworth makes a constant effort to emphasize
the equality between his writing and the language of men. Although he
does discuss several other points, he tends to cycle back to the idea
of him, a poet, being merely a man speaking to man. (299). He goes as
far as to tell the reader that personification was not used in his
Lyrical Ballads because it is “an ordinary device, [used] to
elevate the style and raise it above prose.” (297). After utterly
rejecting personification as an elevated poetic device, he says “my
purpose was to imitate, and, as far as possible, adopt the very
language of men.”(297).
The previous quote
directly contradicts his claim to be a merely a man speaking to men
because he states that he made an effort to adopt the language of
men, rather than being a man whom already spoke the language of men.
I found that in most of the preface, Wordsworth contradicts himself
in this way in order to gain his audience's trust.
For me, his
technique to attempt a sort of allegiance or “equality” with real
men came off as condescending.
When Wordsworth says that a poet is a man speaking to men, he follows
this claim by saying that poets are men speaking to men but they
simply have more passionate thoughts, more knowledge about nature,
more enthusiasm, and a man “who rejoices more than other men in the
spirit of life that is in him.”(299). Almost immediately he
contradicts himself by placing
the inner thoughts and knowledge of poets above common men.
It
is also important to note that Wordsworth is defining poets as he
himself perceives them, and therefore, he is discussing himself as a
poet without directly saying he is talking about himself. Again, I
felt this was condescending and also a way of deceiving the reader
into a feeling of false equality with Wordsworth.
After
reading “Tintern Abbey” I again felt that Wordsworth came off as
condescending. Although I do appreciate the poem's ability to show
Wordsworth's childhood self, present self, and future (dead) self,
Wordsworth discusses his past self by discussing how he is above the
childish ideas he had once. He takes this a step further when he
studies his sister and compares her to him when he was a child. He
says that presently, she is just like he was as a child, which he
previously described as someone who did not think much or at all and
someone who doesn't absorb the environment he often was in.
I agree with the contradictions you've identified in Wordsworth's ideology of the poet. He seems to be cleaving some semblance of a separation between worth (mankind inherently has worth) and ability (the poet has more ability than the average person), which feels very strange to me as worth is usually a product of ability come to fruition. I think Wordsworth talks about the role of the poet with a bit of hubris, suggesting not everyone can express the common life adequately or with eloquence. Also, the idea of putting on common speech is incredibly interesting to me. Thought of in this way, common language may be seen as a veil behind which Wordsworth's true ideals lie. How much does his speech "convince" his audience of his meaning? And is there another Wordsworth outside of this common language?
ReplyDelete