Compared to Keats’ Ode
to a Nightingale, Clare’s The
Nightingale’s Nest portrays an unromantic description of the famous bird.
It is hard to read John Clare, like most of the other Romantic Poets, without
taking into account his lifestyle and upbringing. Clare’s peasant upbringing is
important to his descriptions of the natural world. The nightingale is apart of
the speakers everyday life and is “heard many a merry year-/ At morn and eve,
nay, all the livelong day” (5-6). Although the nightingale is ever present, the
bird only reveals itself 20 lines into the poem when the speaker notes that
it’s strange that “so famed a bird / Should have no better dress than russet
brown” (20-21). The speaker is unimpressed by the physical appearance of the
nightingale and it’s nest. The nest is described as being made of “dead oaken
leaves” (78), “scraps of grass” (80) and “scarce materials” (81), providing an uninspiring
image of the famed nightingale’s dwelling. The speaker’s observations of the
nightingale describe this literarily famous bird as being pretty ordinary. This
unromantic view of nature can be attributed to Clare’s deep understanding of
nature based on his upbringing and lifestyle in the countryside. While Keats
portrays a romanticized and enchanting account of the power of the nightingale’s
song, Clare’s interpretation is not flowered up. Clare’s writing is much more observation
based instead of relying on imagination and glamorized views of the natural
world.

No comments:
Post a Comment