"We look before and after,
And pine for what is not --
Our sincerest laughter
With some pain is fraught --
Our sweetest songs are those that tell of
saddest thought."
Shelley's "To a Sky-Lark" begs the
reader to ask, can a poem merely be beautiful without possessing a deeper and
potentially sadder meaning? Can something exist for the mere sake of existing?
The speaker admires the sky-lark for appearing to have this pure quality to it,
although he seems skeptical that it lacks any hidden agenda. The speaker asks
the bird, “what objects are the fountains of thy happy strain?...or how could
thy notes flow in such chrystal stream?” There appears to be a doubt that pure
happiness and beauty can exist without pain. The fact that the bird sings,
“when it is too high to be visible,” as the footnote states, gives the speaker
a sense of the unattainable – a sense that this music is almost a surreal
creation that can never actually be achieved.
“Teach me half the gladness
That thy brain must know,
Such harmonious madness
From my lips would flow
The world should listen then – as I am listening
now.”
The speaker appears jealous of the skylark in
this last stanza – begging it to teach him how to be purely glad, as if only
then will the world read his poems. The poem seems to suggest that humanity
contains too much sadness and therefore appreciates it in poetry: “our sweetest
songs are those that tell of saddest thought.” However, the speaker yearns for
a simpler world where poetry does not have to contain this pain and he can
merely exist with “clear keen joyance”
No comments:
Post a Comment