On reading “Bright star,
would I were stedfast as thou art” by Keats I was reminded of our discussion on
Tuesday of how Keats strived to be remembered alongside Shakespeare and Milton,
as their equal. This is made apparent in the footnote, which reveals Keats
copied this poem into his collection of Shakespeare’s poems, physically placing
his poetry in the same book as Shakespeare. His approach to the sonnet form in
this context I also read as a direct challenge to Shakespeare’s sonnets. Specifically
the footnote’s reference to a north star reminded me of the line “It [love] is the
star to every wandering bark” in Shakespeare’s sonnet 116. Keats directly
challenges Shakespeare, using the same images and connections as Shakespeare
but in his own way, to force the issue of comparison between them. In light of
the information that Keats was dismissed by his contemporaries due to his lower
class and education, these decisions in his poetry make all the more sense, he
had to force the issue of putting himself in conversation with the greats, it
never would have happened organically. The first part of Keats’ sonnet can be
read as addressing all of these things. HEe wishes he had the steadfast nature
of the star to help him as he struggles to gain acceptance as a poet, while he
is currently “in lone splendor hung aloft” (2). He sees himself high above his
peers but alone, removed from the ‘natural’ cycle of poets from higher class upbringings,
a star removed from the natural imagery. The background information from
Tuesday’s class significantly altered my reading of all the poems for Thursday.
I really like this interpretation of the poem – I think its also interesting to think of in terms of line 4 “like nature’s patient, sleepless eremite.” Despite being alone and “hermit-like” he is patient and sleepless in that he still has hope while struggling as a poet and is constantly “watching” the other poets
ReplyDelete