I’m
presenting on “Darkness” tommorow so here are some kind of related odds &
ends that hopefully won’t make it so we have nothing to talk about tomorrow… :
"Manfred"
Manfred
is referred to a lot as a “Child of Clay” (131)—the concept of man being made
from clay is Biblical and also a characteristic of many religions (Genesis
2:7—“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into
his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul”). The
Bible/religious allusions in “Manfred” are offset and/or questioned by the
supernatural elements; ultimately Manfred really defies religion by defying
Abbot and choosing to die alone rather than to be saved.
The
involvement and sort of reappropration of religion reminded me of the last two
men in “Darkness” who use “holy things/For an unholy usage” (59-60) when they
burn the holy artifacts on an altar for light rather than for worship. Manfred’s
Spirit also tells Abbot in Act 3 Scene 4 to “Waste not thy holy words on idle
uses”—another holy/unholy moment.
The
clay is also present in “Darkness”---the world becomes “a chaos of hard clay” (72),
another interesting/sort-of perversion of religion and man, where the clay
becomes hardened and perhaps thus dissociated from God.
In
Act 3 Scene 3 Abbot says: “It is an awful chaos—light and darkness—/And mind
and dust—and passions and pure thoughts/Mix’d, and contending without end or
order/All dormant or destructive” (3.3 164-7). These ideas are interesting to
think about with “Darkness,” too—there is a chaos in the mix, but then also in “Darkness”
men have lost their passions and are in perhaps a different kind of chaos.
The
poem suggests that this dog, despite being “deny’d in Heaven,” had “all the
virtues of man without his Vices.” The
speaker of the poem is mourning what he considers to have been his only true
friend; whereas the honors on men’s tombs describe them in perhaps faulty/or
overly complimentary terms, the speaker seems to feel that a dog is deserving
of such praise in a way that men are not. This was written after the death of
Byron’s dog Boatswain in 1808, who was (according to Wikipedia) sick with
rabies and who he also apparently cared for until the dog’s death without
caring there was a chance he could have been infected. Wikipedia also notes
that the dog’s tomb is bigger than Byron’s.
There’s
also a dog in “Darkness,” and he appears to play the same loving role—of course
he is the only dog to do so—thus it isn’t just a general appreciation for dogs
but rather an affection for this one dog who demonstrates the virtue of man
without his vice. After learning about this poem and Byron’s affection for his
dog the one true/pure dog in “Darkness” is even more interesting.
"She Walks in Beauty"
I
think the line “all that’s best of dark and bright” (3) is interesting to look
at in the context of “Darkness,” just as it draws that light/dark contrast
ought that is obviously important in both. It’s interesting to think, too,
about the “She” in this poem in contrast with the final “She” of “Darkness”—who
is darkness. The footnote obviously informs us that Byron supposedly wrote “She
Walks in Beauty” about Anne Wilmot, whereas the She in “Darkness” doesn’t
appear to refer to any person as much as it does to a personification of the
Darkness. Still, “She walks in beauty, like the night,” immediately associates
the woman of “She Walks in Beauty” with another darkness. Her darkness appears
to also be pure and “innocent” (18), though, a sentiment that is pretty absent
from “Darkness.”
The Sound of Silence
So
I haven’t exactly done an intense analysis of this song in relation to “Darkness,”
but the first line does personify it in a similar way (though of course Byron’s
personification doesn’t come until the end of the poem). The vision/dream in
this song is also interesting—especially as it is a vision and a dream and kind
of blurs the line between the two, just as Byron does with the line “I had a
dream, which was not all a dream” (1). The neon signs in “The Sound of Silence”
are also a kind of aritificial light that perhaps aligns with the image of the
fire in “Darkness,” though the song and poem do seem to consider religion
differently.
NBC’s Revolution
Maybe
almost embarrassed to post this because it is admitting that I’ve seen some of
this show. But I just thought of it so thought I’d throw it in… we all appear
to remain interested in the concept of the lights “going off”—how we refer to
losing light and electricity as “losing power.” The loss of light results in a
chaotic dystopia in the show, too. Our obsession with imagining the end of the
world/the possibility of the world ending doesn’t seem to have faded since
Byron’s time---both the poem and show (and also the many other dystopic
shows/movies that exist today) also feature the way that men play a key role in
their own downfall.
I think it's really interesting how you refer to the dog in "Darkness" as the one "true/pure" dog -- this therefore serves to emphasize and dramatize the utter morbidity of the end of the world in the fact that even the virtuous beings cannot save anyone and they too die.
ReplyDeleteThere is also something very dark about specifically a dog dying. Dogs have a symbolic connection to humans that is far greater than other animals (my grandmother used to watch horror movies, and she would say that the man with the dog always lives. She was right every time), so for Byron to not just kill a pure soul but to kill a dog seems to be an attempt to push this poem to an extreme almost for the sake of being extreme.
ReplyDelete