The first line ending—“mortality”—is the only
incomplete rhyme in the poem—it looks like “sky” or “die,” it sounds more like
“sleep” and “steep”---but it doesn’t fit completely with either, which feels
odd since the rest of the poem follows the rhyme scheme for a Petrarchan
sonnet. The “ee” sound the first line ends on, though, doesn’t feel out of
place; it is in “spirit,” “weak,” and “heavily” before we get to the “sleep” at
the end of the second line. Thus the not-quite rhyme between “mortality” and
“sleep” is evident immediately, drawing a clear distinction between what
mortality implies (death) and sleep—which is interesting because the speaker is
at the same time trying to compare mortality to an “unwilling sleep” (2). This
is really odd, too—first is the idea (and maybe this is because I’m tired, but.)
that any sleep would be “unwilling”—usually we sleep because we are tired, and
thus want to sleep. Also, waking up often implies a kind of epiphany, and you
would think that mortality would be
the epiphany—it seems that way for the speaker, at least. Still, he says that
mortality is the sleep—could one wake up and out of mortality, then?
The marble and the weak spirit create an immediate
contrast between heaviness and lightness. The weight of the mortality aligns
with the weight of the the marble. At first this feels a bit odd, because
mortality implies death while marble seems more permanent, but the image of the
marble wasting away is revealed at the end of the poem. This vision of
mortality suggests that the speaker sees himself as something that was once
great but will now die—it fits well with the image of the “sick eagle,” an
animal that was perhaps once as majestic as marble but, now sick, cannot fly. However,
it is the “imagined pinnacle and steep/Of godlike hardship” that “tells me I
must die”---perhaps the fact that it is “imagined” suggests that it is not
mortality itself, rather the speaker’s realization of his mortality that makes
his spirit weak, makes the sick eagle only look at the sky and not attempt to
fly.
(a line from Keats’s final letter feels like it
ties in: “I have an habitual feeling of my real life having past, and that I am
leading a posthumous existence” (p. 980)
I also remember him maybe comparing himself to an
eagle at one point in a letter? or maybe just mentioning an eagle? not sure)
The suggestion that the “glories of the brain” are
“dim-conceived” feels odd in a poem whose title has a focus on sight (“On
Seeing…”) and when the line before bears the image of “the opening of the
morning’s eye” (8). While the first eight lines focus on clarity and sight, the
dimness introduced in the second part creates greater uncertainty that
continues in the heart’s “undescribable feud”—and it is also in the final image
of the sun on the “billowy” ocean (13). The sun’s shadow is not only it’s
opposite in its lack of light---because it is reflected on the ocean it loses
another kind of clarity, that of shape, and becomes even more indistinct. The
syntax of the poem gets confusing for me here, too, and I think it fits well
with the blurring of the shadow. I’m still not sure if I completely understand
the last sentence of the poem, actually---the hyphens are hard to follow. I
didn’t connect it there at first, but is the last hyphen supposed to also call
us back to the beginning of the poem?--- “My spirit is too weak—…—a shadow of a
magnitude.” The speaker’s spirit is then the shadow of the marble. Marble is
(supposed to be, at least) distinct and clear cut—with “pinnacles” and steeps,
it represents an ideal, like the sun—unreacheable but that which we use to
model our world upon. The spirit, however, is something the speaker understands
less; he can’t make it as godlike or ideal as marble. Still, even the marble participates
in the “rude/Wasting of old time” (12-3), and it seems this loss/death of the
speaker’s ideal is what makes him lose hope for his own spirit. Or maybe the
loss is the fact that the ideal can only be represented by/in humans, and
therefore cannot last, or translate into anything that lasts, as even the sun
becomes an unclear shadow when it gets closer.
I agree that the poem is often perplexing. However, I believe that after reading more of Keats his mixing of opposites is a recurring theme. For example, "Bright Star" sees Keats debates the merit of "steadfastness." He presents the benefits of a star's coldness with the warmth of the bosom of his lover, but evokes similarities between the two. Keats presents his prose in a way which makes his final opinion on the issue of firmness unclear. He is more of a poet who experiments than one who is willing to make firm statements. This leads to the "dizzy pain" (11) and "dim-concieved glories of the brain" (9) in "Elgin Marbles," statements which at face value contradict themselves. Keats is willing to mix pleasure and pain, moments of mournfulness and moments of joy. He is a master chemist of emotions.
ReplyDelete